Lakewood Megachurch Visit

My wife and daughter and I attended the late-morning service this morning at Lakewood Church’s new 16,000–seat facility, a mile up the street from our house.   

Greeters were everywhere, shaking everyone’s hand, saying “Good morning, God bless you!” and directing the incoming crowds to specific entrances.  They did a good job of seating people rapidly and efficiently.

The bookstore at the top of the escalator looked like a Barnes & Noble.  I could see stacks of copies of senior pastor Joel Osteen’s book, Your Best Life Now.

They called it a worship service, but it was really a praise-music rock concert with some preaching thrown in (although they did include the traditional hymns It Is Well With My Soul and Great Is Thy Faithfulness).  The female lead singer, who I believe was music director Cindy Cruse-Ratliff, has a fabulous voice and great stage presence.  She could easily have been a country music star.  I’ve read that she writes much of the praise music herself.  Her backup group  The choir was excellent.  Technically, the production values were first-rate.

The focus of the preaching this morning (as it was earlier in our own church) was on helping Hurricane Katrina evacuees from New Orleans.  We heard not only from Joel Osteen but from his wife Victoria and from his brother Paul, a physician who gave up his practice to work in the church.

The themes of the preaching were pretty much the Lakewood staples that I’d read about:  God is a great God.  He is always good.  He is always faithful.  He is always in control.  He has good things in mind for you.   There doesn’t seem to be much room for doubt about the first point.   And I can provisionally accept the second and third points on sheer wishful thinking faith.  But the last two points assume too many facts not in evidence.

Liturgy?  Nope.  The preachers delivered extemporaneous prayers for the victims of Katrina.  There was one repeat-after-me prayer to Jesus during the altar call at the end.  And of course, there was the singing.  Otherwise, there was essentially no congregational participation.  If people prayed, they did it individually, not together.

The offering appeal, by Victoria Osteen, was brief, discreet, and tasteful.  I’ve read that the Osteens, starting with pater familias John (Joel’s late father), have never allowed the offering appeal to be included in their television broadcasts.

There wasn’t a cross in sight, anywhere.  My daughter noticed that, too.  We couldn’t figure out why.   

What we did see, everywhere we looked, was the Lakewood lamp logo.  It reminded me strongly of the Unitarian Universalist logo.  That was interesting, because Lakewood theology is not much at all like that of the UUs.

I’m glad we went.  The Lakewood worship style is not to my taste, but all tastes are tastes.  As we march along on the path to God, there’s no reason the jodies all have to be ancient catholic liturgies.

And say what you will:   Every week the Osteens manage to get thousands of people to focus on God, instead of on themselves, their desires, or their troubles.  That’s not lightly to be dismissed.

Comments

14 responses to “Lakewood Megachurch Visit”

  1. currahee Avatar

    At one level I can’t understand the appeal of these services – I can’t possibly see how one can feel the presence of the Holy Spirit in something so completely secular (I’ve read that in places like the Saddleback Church they actually use Powerpoint presentations).
    On another level it makes complete sense. It reinforces my belief that these aren’t really about God at all – it’s about people in our hyper-individualistic, atomizing, bowling-alone society creating a community using forms and symbols familiar and comfortable to all. Hence the consumer culture wrappings: the Borders-looking bookstore, the Starbucks-looking coffee hour, the Powerpoint liturgy.

  2. trevize Avatar
    trevize

    currahee,
    While I agree with your assessment of our consumeristic culture, I think you are too harsh on modern worship styles and the use of technology in church, and many of your complaints are about the style rather than the substance.
    The medium-sized church I attend runs a youth-oriented evening service which sports a logo, but it is hardly something we find ourselves focussing on. Prayers during worship are individual, but we spend some time each night praying with people next to us. (Many young people today actually find the traditional unison recital of creeds and responses rather creepy, zombie-like.)
    Over the year or two since we launched the new service, we have found that our focus has moved more and more from the cool music, logos, etc. (though these are still present) to a deep desire to see God working in the lives of the people there. I have become friends with people from radically different walks of life, and sharing in their trials and challenges has been amazing. My point is that a modern style of doing church need not mean a dearth of authentic community.
    Still, I am very interested in the phenomena of small, emerging churches and the opportunities these offer for building communities.
    As for powerpoint, I don’t see what’s wrong with visual aids?

  3. Cathie Avatar
    Cathie

    While I’ve never attended a mega-church service, I can’t imagine any church without a cross in it. As an Episcopalian, I doubt I’d care much for a service without liturgy and I know I prefer a church that follows the traditional church year, from Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Holy Week, Easter and Pentecost.
    The seasons of the church year are not just a matter of taste, but serve to keep us mindful of the nature of the God we worship.

  4. currahee Avatar

    The whole point of a traditional liturgy is to reinforce ties with two millenia worth of Christian discovery and wisdom. Proper liturgy elevates us out of the temporal to discover the timeless, the universal.
    As a punk rock- and rockabilly-loving Gen X’er who cut his teeth on Nirvana I approve of making worship accessible in alternate, modern forms. However, this doesn’t absolve us of the responsibility to ensure that traditional liturgy is preserved so as to be available to the youth when they are no longer too young to appreciate it. Eventually they will come home.
    Moreover, I refuse to believe that traditional liturgy – properly presented – can’t appeal to the young. An example is Compline it was resurrected as an art form by Seattle college students in the early ’60s – Compline now serves as a gateway to the Church in one of the most secular, modernist cities in America.
    At a more worrisome level, the repackaging of the Gospel in consumerist trappings seems to be done deliberately to reinforce the neo-Calvinist idea that the present economic structure of consumerist, corporate-governed America is right and just in God’s eyes. This is a direct challenge to Episcopal notions of the Social Gospel.
    As for Powerpoint, it belongs in Bible Study and vestry meetings, not liturgy. Don’t people get enough Powerpoint during the week?

  5. trevize Avatar
    trevize

    Cathie,
    “While I’ve never attended a mega-church service, I can’t imagine any church without a cross in it.”
    Again, the church I attend doesn’t feature a cross much, but I have often thought that this is partly because of its multicultural nature. Some people from other cultures who might come in are sensitive to centralised icons, assuming that Christians worship a cross as a kind of symbol. We also refrain from decorating the church with dragons during Chinese New Year.
    However, I agree there are good things about the traditional church year.
    currahee,
    “The whole point of a traditional liturgy is to reinforce ties with two millenia worth of Christian discovery and wisdom. Proper liturgy elevates us out of the temporal to discover the timeless, the universal.”
    This is a good point. There is a dilemma in how to preserve the good from tradition while making it relevant to people today. All I can say is that my memories from my Anglican high school chapel services are of tedious prayer-book readings followed by cult-like repetitions and responses. I was probably more patient with all this than most of my classmates, who, I expect, couldn’t wait to leave “church” behind forever.
    “At a more worrisome level, the repackaging of the Gospel in consumerist trappings seems to be done deliberately to reinforce the neo-Calvinist idea that the present economic structure of consumerist, corporate-governed America is right and just in God’s eyes. This is a direct challenge to Episcopal notions of the Social Gospel.”
    I think you’re right in many cases. Sometimes it’s just that a certain visual style from the secular world is adopted to help bring a sense of familiarity.
    Applying gospel principles to societal justice is something I would like to see more in evangelical congregations. Our young workers’ group is concentrating on the Micah Challenge over the next month, and it’s a refreshing change from the usual “personal” emphasis.

  6. Cathie Avatar
    Cathie

    Trevise writes:
    “Some people from other cultures who might come in are sensitive to centralised icons, assuming that Christians worship a cross as a kind of symbol. We also refrain from decorating the church with dragons during Chinese New Year.”
    Yes, some people from other cultures – and even our own – might mistakenly assume that Christians worship the cross. This no reason NOT to have a cross displayed. Inasmuch as all religions include symbols and metaphor, the Cross is THE symbol of Christianity and its primary metaphor. Rather than removing it from churches, we should display it prominently and explain its meaning to those unfamiliar with it.
    If I went to a Buddhist temple, a Mosque, a Synagogue, etc., I wouldn’t expect the worshipers there to remove their religious symbols or icons simply because I might be unfamiliar or uncomfortable with them. It would be incumbent upon me learn the meaning of those symbols.

  7. trevize Avatar
    trevize

    “the Cross is THE symbol of Christianity and its primary metaphor”
    I would have thought many of the more liberal Christians would disagree with you there, not holding with Penal Substitution, etc. The crucifixion is just a bit of a bummer which shouldn’t have had to happen, or something.
    Personally, I agree that the events of the cross are important, and yet the Holy Spirit is living in the people of the church, not in a permanently installed piece of art.
    One symbol I really can’t stand is the fish. I wish people would stop putting it on their cars. It means nothing to non-christians except “I’m part of an exclusive and incomprehensible club”.

  8. D. C. Avatar

    “the Cross is THE symbol of Christianity and its primary metaphor”
    Cathie is of course correct that the cross is the primary symbol of Christianity. John McCain tells a poignant story in his book Faith of our Fathers. A North Vietnamese prison guard silently traced a cross in the sand with his foot to let McCain know he was a Christian, then quickly scuffed it out. That guard was one of the few that went out of his way to surreptitiously treat McCain humanely.
    I had to smile at Trevize’s parody of what some liberals surely believe (“The crucifixion is just a bit of a bummer which shouldn’t have had to happen, or something.”) Still, one can legitimately view the crucifixion as a seminal event in the birth of the church, without having to sign on to Paul’s peculiar views about its meaning.
    To me the cross has long symbolized Jesus’s trust in God and faithfulness to him, even unto death. We don’t need to be masochists to aspire to that level of trust and faithfulness.
    Trevize, the fish has never bothered me; in fact, it’s amusing to see the variations that have arisen, such as the Darwin fish, and the Jesus fish eating the Darwin fish or vice versa.

  9. trevize Avatar
    trevize

    “it’s amusing to see the variations that have arisen, such as the Darwin fish, and the Jesus fish eating the Darwin fish or vice versa.”
    To be serious, though, DC, doesn’t that bother you, that so many people see this entire scientific theory as being mutually exclusive with Christianity? Or that some people are so obsessed by it that they would go to the trouble of producing such novelties? I find it hard to see what’s amusing about it.

  10. Cathie Avatar
    Cathie

    Trevise – For many Christians the Cross represents penal substitution, but for many others it does not. It certainly doesn’t for me. As for people who view science and Christianity as mutually exclusive, I’ve finally come to the conclusion that there isn’t any way I can control what others think or believe and I try not to let it get to me.

  11. Susan Primm Avatar
    Susan Primm

    I was born and raised Catholic, attending Catholic schools for most of my schooling years. My husband and I began attending Lakewood about 6/7 weeks ago, we are now members. It has been a life changing experience for us to attend a service being told we are good in leiu of what we have always heard, repent of your sins and your going to hell…Paster Joel Osteen teaches us we are good and to hold God as the center of your good thoughts and deeds. Walk with happy hearts and expecting good things instead of what I was taught as a Catholic, guilt! We have friends who started attending 3 weeks ago, he is Jewish, she is Cathoic in 18 years of marriage, they have never practiced any form of religion, how could they? They love attending Lakewood receiving Paster Joel’s message, going has been wonderful for them and their marriage, enough said about Lakewood and its message….

  12. K.D. Carter Avatar
    K.D. Carter

    I truely appreciate this description of my church; I have been a member of Lakewood for about 3 years, but have attended periodically since I was about 4 [I’m 23 now].
    I will say this, the church, while under John Osteen’s leadership, did not have crosses in it either. I am trying to understand why people are so focused on the look of a church instead of what the church has to offer.
    I am proud of my church, and not because we’ve “made history” by moving into a sports area, but because of all the churches I have been to, this family seems to be the most real.
    One characteristic you do not find to be the norm among mega-church pastors is driving a nine-year old Lexus handed down from his father. Yes, Joel lives in a million-dollar house. But how many people knew that he lived there before he became a minister at Lakewood [4 years before].
    Joel and the rest of the Osteens are givers, and God has blessed them because of their giving. Many harp on him because he doesn’t comdemn, but you have got to get the unchurched in the church first.
    When you are born, your parents do not immediately beat you down with rules and the bad things you are probably going to do. Your parents show you love, and that you are wanted. Lakewood was formerly known as “The Oasis of Love.” That’s what we experience every Sunday, and Wednesday, and Saturday when we walk through those doors. We experience people telling us that we are loved by the Almighty God, and that He wants what is best for us, and that if we fall, it’s okay because He [in his abundant love] is willing and wants to pick us up and carry us to another level. And if I can get all of that without actually seeing a cross in the building, I’m okay with that.

  13. Kaycee Mason Avatar
    Kaycee Mason

    Cathie,
    If Joel Osteen is teaching you that you are good, he is wrong because man is not inherently good but by nature sinful. Do you know what the Bible says about that topic and where it says so? If we were good then Christ died in vain. However, because of His death we can be forgiven and no longer carry the guilt burden.
    It appears to me that this is what is wrong with certain megachurches: that they are pleasing people to keep them attending. That does not seem in keeping with the doctrine of Christ, the apostles, the entire Bible for that matter.

  14. Megan Avatar
    Megan

    I would just like to throw this out there even though this is an old posting that I am 24 years old and until I moved to Houston 3 years ago and discovered Lakewood, I resented being taken to church by my parents. It was all “Hell, fire, and brimstone” and I think that is completely unnecessary! I don’t want to be SCARED into believing! Lakewood does not send the message that you are perfect…the message is that you aren’t expected to be but are loved anyway! The best way I can put it is “living right”…we are simply reminded to “live right” and treat others with respect. And I don’t have to hear that I’ll be damned for all eternity 8 times in a sermon to get the message. And the big difference…because of the way the message is delivered, I want to do the right things..I’m not just doing it out of fear. Sorry, call me young and naive but I respect and love my God…I don’t want to be afraid of Him!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *