Troubling Inconsistencies in the New Testament: Five Reasons for Skepticism (Revised)

Occasioned by a discussion in which I participated earlier this week, I’ve just finished a major revision of an essay I did a couple of years ago, which is now titled, Troubling Inconsistencies in the New Testament: Five Reasons for Skepticism.

I did this revision primarily so that I’ll have it as a ready reference — these days, I really am trying to get away from directly challenging traditionalists about their theology, because it’s largely a waste of time. 

I’m far more interested in reaching out to skeptics and non-believers who, deep in their hearts, sort of wish they could believe, but haven’t found a way to do so that’s consistent with their educations and experience.  I feel a special obligation to such folks, perhaps because I used to be one of them.  They simply don’t buy the argument that "The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it!"   So I’m trying to articulate alternative, positive, empirically-defensible arguments why it makes good sense:

  • to conclude that God exists;
  • to put one’s trust in him and make one’s self available for his service;
  • and to follow Jesus.

Comments

One response to “Troubling Inconsistencies in the New Testament: Five Reasons for Skepticism (Revised)”

  1. vynette Avatar

    Dear D.C. Toedt
    Regarding your statement:
    “Matthew 1.2-17 and Luke 3.23-38 give two considerably-inconsistent genealogies for Jesus. The most obvious difficulty is Joseph’s father: Was Joseph born of Jacob (says Matthew), or Heli (says Luke)?”
    These genealogies certainly are different, but they are not inconsistent. It is the doctrine of the Miraculous Incarnation that makes them appear so.
    Matthew gives the supposed father of Jesus (Joseph)while Luke gives the biological father (Heli).
    It was necessary to demonstrate the Jesus of Nazareth was entitled by birth to sit on the throne on David. If he were not, he could not have been nominated as the ‘messiah’ nor called the ‘King of Israel’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *