The Lambeth Conference and primates’ meetings are no more significant than the U.S. Conference of Mayors or the National Governors Association

The Anglican Communion seems to be epitomized by the primates’ meetings and the decennial Lambeth Conferences. Some traditionalists seem to think that, if the Episcopal Church’s bishops weren’t invited to the 2008 Lambeth Conference, or if our presiding bishop didn’t attend the primates’ meetings, we’d lose our co-equal status in the Communion, and thus that which (supposedly) makes TEC “special” as a church.

But the “Anglican Communion” is something of a phantom:

  • The Lambeth Conference resembles nothing so much as the U.S. Conference of Mayors (except that the Lambeth Conference meets only every ten years and only by invitation of the Archbishop of Canterbury).
  • The primates’ meetings appear to be closely analogous to the U.S. National Governors Association.
  • And the other “instruments of Communion”  — which some trads are quietly starting to call “Instruments of Unity” — namely the Anglican Consultative Council and the Archbishop of Canterbury, have essentially zero real authority in the churches of the Communion (except of course for the ABC’s primatial authority in the Church of England).

Suppose a politician were to claim that his state owed its political identity to its governor’s membership in the National Governors Association and its mayors’ invitations to U.S. Conference of Mayors meetings. His constituency would think it decidedly odd.

It’s likewise decidedly odd to think the Episcopal Church’s ecclesiastical identity is primarily symbolized by our PB’s attendance at primates’ meetings and our bishops’ invitations to Lambeth.

The Episcopal Church existed long before the Anglican Communion did. If we were to stop participating in its various meetings, and even if we were booted out entirely, life would go on — and maybe we could even get back to work bringing people to God.

Comments

One response to “The Lambeth Conference and primates’ meetings are no more significant than the U.S. Conference of Mayors or the National Governors Association”

  1. Mike Watson Avatar
    Mike Watson

    D. C., I wish to correct what I believe is a misapprehension you have about the Anglican Communion, this one less significant and more technical than the one flagged in the comments to the entry immediately below. It’s doubtful that the “trads” you are speaking of are “quietly starting” to call the Communion’s Instruments of Communion the Instruments of Unity. More likely, they never got around to stopping to call them Instruments of Unity. Because that’s what they were called until the Anglican Consultative Council resolved at ACC-13 in June 2005 that it would follow the Windsor Report’s recommendation to change the terminology and refer to the Archbishop of Canterbury as the focus for unity and the other Instruments as Instruments of Communion.
    And as for your statement that the Instruments have “essentially zero real authority in the churches of the Communion,” as far as I know, no one is claiming that they do. They do, however, have authority in the Anglican Communion itself, which at least some people think has importance or there wouldn’t be all the fuss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *