Leaving Evangelicalism – Essay

An interesting essay about the author’s recognition that it was time for him to leave the evangelical faith in which he had grown up (hat tip: Freethinking Faith).  Excerpt (paragraphing added):

. . .  More significant than any specific belief, however, is the general evangelical perception that everything is a black-and-white issue.

For an evangelical, something is either good or bad; but which ever it is, they are absolutely certain about it.  Evangelicals feel they have the truth because they have the inspired Word of God in their Bibles and the right interpretation of it.

But through my studies in the philosophy of knowledge, I had come to the belief that human beings simply don’t have access to absolutely certain knowledge about many, many things, not least certain knowledge of historical events such as those recorded in the Bible.  . . . 

In a culture where everyone seemed so damn certain about everything, I felt pretty uncomfortable!

 

 

Comments

3 responses to “Leaving Evangelicalism – Essay”

  1. Cathie Avatar
    Cathie

    Some people do seem to need that black/white, right/wrong kind of faith in absolutes and they also need to believe in a God who is wrathful and judgmental. I wonder why it is that those who take the Bible so literally are also the ones who are political hawks rather than doves.
    One thing I’ve always liked about my own Anglican tradition is that our Prayer Book and its liturgy don’t focus very much on divine retribution.

  2. trevize Avatar
    trevize

    “I wonder why it is that those who take the Bible so literally are also the ones who are political hawks rather than doves.”
    In our particular context sometimes, but this is not necessarily so. If we look at people who take the Bible more literally than the average citizen in the West, there are many who are pacifists, or who work with the poor. More concerning than political hawks and doves are political sheep, that very large segment of the population who do nothing to promote justice or injustice. And many of those consider the bible an old book with little relevance, or just don’t care.
    There is a view of personal faith which sees the black-and-white thing as the first, naive and simple stage in faith, which often happens in youth or just after conversion. The second stage is a swing to the opposite, an “everything is grey” approach which is rudderless and often precipitated by a personal crisis. The third stage is one of maturity in faith, which enables the believer to major on the majors, avoiding the hobby-horses of Stage 1, and the snidey cynicism of Stage 2. In my opinion, Stage 3 individuals may be conservative or liberal in their theology, but people in conservative churches seem often to be encouraged to stay in Stage 1, while people in liberal churches often get stuck in Stage 2.

  3. David Huff Avatar
    David Huff

    trevize,
    Well said. There’s actually a good book entitled Stages of Faith : The Psychology of Human Development by James Fowler which models these stages, building on some work by classic psychological researchers like Piaget, Erikson, and Kohlberg. Can be a bit tough going unless you’re familiar with Piaget, et al, but even memories of an undergraduate “survey of psychology” course would probably suffice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *