Keeping the Primates’ Country Club Together

It’s being reported in the British press that the Archbishop of Canterbury is going along with the conservative primates in ostracizing the U.S. and Canadian churches, even though he personally believes the North Americans are right:

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, is understood to have backed
the uncompromising stance after week-long talks in Northern Ireland failed to
achieve reconciliation.

Though privately sympathetic with the liberals, he has fought to preserve
unity because he does not want to be the archbishop who presides over the
break-up of the international Communion.

One never knows how much credence to give reports like this (although it’s consistent with other things I’ve read in the past few years).  If it is true, it’s a tragedy.   This report would indicate that ++Williams deems it more important to keep the primates’ country club together — I’m sorry, that’s uncharitable, I mean "more important to try to stay in the good graces of his Global South colleagues" — than it is to do what he himself believes to be the right thing for a marginalized and often-oppressed minority.   

I don’t think anyone would question that the ABC’s heart is in the
right place.  But we would have every reason to be terribly disappointed
in his judgment.   

Comments

3 responses to “Keeping the Primates’ Country Club Together”

  1. John Wilkins Avatar

    I think Williams has a much longer view. The public acceptance of homosexuality has much more to do with technology, property and affluence than the church. He might just see that eventually, as the south becomes richer, they will also change. Forty years ago, our own culture wasn’t much different. I’m not letting him off the hook completely.
    There are plenty of things that are not reported. The Anglican women, for example, are not halting their own relationships with the ECW. There are plenty of other pan anglican organizations that will build relationships. I suspect that the ARchbishop – and Frank – are going to use these the the best of their ability.

  2. D. C. Avatar

    John, you might be right about ++Williams taking a longer view. You’re definitely right that the Global South’s mores will evolve as its wealth increases (and as American culture becomes all-pervasive).
    But I’m hard-pressed to think of historical examples where an accommodationist strategy actually succeeded in bringing about desired behavior changes in adversaries. Often all it does is embolden them.
    And make no mistake about it, ++Akinola, and his allies foreign and domestic, are the adversaries of Christians who seek to be open to the truth, whatever truth turns out to be (paraphrasing the Rev. Barbara Brown Taylor).
    Turning the other cheek, taking the hit as a first step toward ending a cycle of confrontation, is one thing. That can work when the other side is willing to reciprocate (as we may finally, please God, be starting to see in Israel and the nascent Palestinian state, for example).
    Unfortunately, in the current disputes over homosexuality, I haven’t seen much turning of other cheeks by the hard-liners in either camp.

  3. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Several times I have heard it repeated that the ABoC has said he would ordain gay priests simply because he knows several homosexual Christians whom he feels would make excellent priests. He is undoubtably one of the top minds in Christendom, but it doesn’t take a PhD. count heads.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *